What does the term 'Separation of Duties' refer to in Workday Security?

What does the term 'Separation of Duties' refer to in Workday Security?

• A. A measure to combine all tasks under one user
• B. A strategy to minimize risk by dividing tasks among users
• C. A protocol that allows one user to approve all transactions
• D. An approach to reduce user accountability

Answer: (B)

The term 'Separation of Duties' in Workday Security refers to a strategy aimed at minimizing risk by dividing tasks among multiple users. This principle is fundamental to organizational security because it helps prevent fraud and errors. By ensuring that no single user has control over all aspects of any critical business process, organizations can create a system of checks and balances. This approach can help mitigate the risk of intentional misconduct or accidental mistakes since different individuals are involved in the various stages of a transaction or task. When tasks are distributed among various users, it not only enhances security but also promotes accountability within the organization. Each user is responsible for their specific tasks, which helps track activity more effectively and allows for a more thorough audit trail. In contrast, the other options present practices that do not align with security best practices. Combining all tasks under one user or allowing one user to approve all transactions can create significant vulnerabilities, as these scenarios concentrate too much power and responsibility in the hands of a single individual. Similarly, an approach that reduces user accountability undermines the fundamental goals of effective governance and security, making it easier for issues to arise without clear ownership or oversight.

The term 'Separation of Duties' in Workday Security refers to a strategy aimed at minimizing risk by dividing tasks among multiple users. This principle is fundamental to organizational security because it helps prevent fraud and errors. By ensuring that no single user has control over all aspects of any critical business process, organizations can create a system of checks and balances. This approach can help mitigate the risk of intentional misconduct or accidental mistakes since different individuals are involved in the various stages of a transaction or task.

When tasks are distributed among various users, it not only enhances security but also promotes accountability within the organization. Each user is responsible for their specific tasks, which helps track activity more effectively and allows for a more thorough audit trail.

In contrast, the other options present practices that do not align with security best practices. Combining all tasks under one user or allowing one user to approve all transactions can create significant vulnerabilities, as these scenarios concentrate too much power and responsibility in the hands of a single individual. Similarly, an approach that reduces user accountability undermines the fundamental goals of effective governance and security, making it easier for issues to arise without clear ownership or oversight.